It takes the average reader and 26 minutes to read Impact of Strategic Culture on U. S. Policies for East Asia by Frank L., Frank L Miller, Jr.
Assuming a reading speed of 250 words per minute. Learn more
Every new administration enters office hearing calls for renewed emphasis on our relations with East Asia,1 stressing the importance of that region to both the U.S. economy and its security. Often articles are published highlighting a recent poll or survey that places ethnic Asians as a growing force in the U.S. political landscape. Campaign rhetoric is replete with criticisms of the incumbent's East Asia policies. Invariably though, each new administration levels off its rhetoric to accept relations nearly equaling those of its predecessor. Why? Is it the relative stability of the region that allows us to focus on other, more troubling regions of the world? Or is it due more to a frustration in determining how better to deal with a region as diverse and mysterious as the Far East? Is the level of "inscrutability" still too high for westerners to understand? Perhaps the approach is wrong. Perhaps the concept of East Asia as a region is too broad. Or perhaps our European-based culture is unable to accept that we don't need to take a leading role in every region of the world in order for that region to achieve security and stability. So what is our role in East Asia? How do we approach this region, lacking in homogeneity and common culture, language, politics, geography, etc. In fact, about the only factor common in the region is its history of interactions over thousands of years with just this same list of uncommon characteristics. As we enter the second decade of post-Cold War relations, it is time to assess how the end of that period affected the U.S.-East Asian relationship, whether the changes made were worthwhile, and whether further changes can and should be made. Multiple studies were made of the U.S. policies toward East Asia following the end of the global bipolarity we commonly call the Cold War. Lasting 50 years, the Cold War was blamed for two of the three major wars the United States fought in Asia during the 20th century. With the dissolution of the Soviet Union and the accompanying abrogation of Moscow's ideologically based support agreements around the world, the time was never better to reassess our own policies concerning the security and stability of East Asia. The countries of the region were also reassessing their intraregional relationships, especially those based on the defense against--or in support of--Communism. As alluded to earlier, these assessments continue, highlighting the ongoing importance of the region to U.S. national interests.
Impact of Strategic Culture on U. S. Policies for East Asia by Frank L., Frank L Miller, Jr. is 26 pages long, and a total of 6,656 words.
This makes it 9% the length of the average book. It also has 8% more words than the average book.
The average oral reading speed is 183 words per minute. This means it takes and 36 minutes to read Impact of Strategic Culture on U. S. Policies for East Asia aloud.
Impact of Strategic Culture on U. S. Policies for East Asia is suitable for students ages 8 and up.
Note that there may be other factors that effect this rating besides length that are not factored in on this page. This may include things like complex language or sensitive topics not suitable for students of certain ages.
When deciding what to show young students always use your best judgement and consult a professional.
Impact of Strategic Culture on U. S. Policies for East Asia by Frank L., Frank L Miller, Jr. is sold by several retailers and bookshops. However, Read Time works with Amazon to provide an easier way to purchase books.
To buy Impact of Strategic Culture on U. S. Policies for East Asia by Frank L., Frank L Miller, Jr. on Amazon click the button below.
Buy Impact of Strategic Culture on U. S. Policies for East Asia on Amazon