How Long to Read Improving Risk Assessment from the Perspective of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making

How Long Does it Take to Read Improving Risk Assessment from the Perspective of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making?

It takes the average reader to read Improving Risk Assessment from the Perspective of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making by Zhen Hua

Assuming a reading speed of 250 words per minute. Learn more

Description

Failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) is one of the most powerful reliability analysis techniques for identifying and preventing potential risks across various fields. Current FMEA methods, while effective, still present several shortcomings. First, the crisp numbers cannot effectively elicit experts' fuzzy evaluations. Second, the weight of risk factors (i.e., occurrence, severity and detection) are assumed to be equal, which cannot reflect their different importance. Third, the traditional calculation method for risk priority is coarse and lack practical implications. There may exist the situation that two failure modes have the same risk priority number but with different risk levels. To improve the performance of FMEA, multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods have been employed to support risk evaluation and prioritization in recent years. This book proposes a novel FMEA method by exploring several MCDM techniques. Benefiting from these techniques, the traditional FMEA method can be improved from the above mentioned aspects. First, the ELICIT linguistic model is employed to generate group risk assessments under uncertainty, which can better model experts' uncertain expressions. Then, grey relation analysis (GRA) is incorporated into the decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) method to objectively determine the weight of risk factors. Afterward, the traditional outranking method is generalized into the ELICIT environment to prioritize the failure modes. Finally, a case study of FMEA for electro-mechanical actuators is presented to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed method.

How long is Improving Risk Assessment from the Perspective of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making?

Improving Risk Assessment from the Perspective of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making by Zhen Hua is 0 pages long, and a total of 0 words.

This makes it 0% the length of the average book. It also has 0% more words than the average book.

How Long Does it Take to Read Improving Risk Assessment from the Perspective of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Aloud?

The average oral reading speed is 183 words per minute. This means it takes to read Improving Risk Assessment from the Perspective of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making aloud.

What Reading Level is Improving Risk Assessment from the Perspective of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making?

Improving Risk Assessment from the Perspective of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making is suitable for students ages 2 and up.

Note that there may be other factors that effect this rating besides length that are not factored in on this page. This may include things like complex language or sensitive topics not suitable for students of certain ages.

When deciding what to show young students always use your best judgement and consult a professional.

Where Can I Buy Improving Risk Assessment from the Perspective of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making?

Improving Risk Assessment from the Perspective of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making by Zhen Hua is sold by several retailers and bookshops. However, Read Time works with Amazon to provide an easier way to purchase books.

To buy Improving Risk Assessment from the Perspective of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making by Zhen Hua on Amazon click the button below.