It takes the average reader 4 hours and 10 minutes to read Wittgensteins Critique of Russells Multiple Relation Theory of Judgement by James R. Connelly
Assuming a reading speed of 250 words per minute. Learn more
Wittgenstein’s May–June 1913 critique of Russell’s multiple-relation theory of judgement (or MRTJ) marked a crucial turning point in the lives of two great twentieth-century thinkers. It was also a watershed moment within the history of analytic philosophy itself. Yet scholarly consensus around a satisfactory interpretation of the nature of the critique, the extent of and reasons for its impact on Russell, along with the role it played within Wittgenstein’s development have remained elusive. With these facts in mind, this book aims to accomplish four interrelated goals. The first is to...
Wittgensteins Critique of Russells Multiple Relation Theory of Judgement by James R. Connelly is 250 pages long, and a total of 62,500 words.
This makes it 84% the length of the average book. It also has 76% more words than the average book.
The average oral reading speed is 183 words per minute. This means it takes 5 hours and 41 minutes to read Wittgensteins Critique of Russells Multiple Relation Theory of Judgement aloud.
Wittgensteins Critique of Russells Multiple Relation Theory of Judgement is suitable for students ages 12 and up.
Note that there may be other factors that effect this rating besides length that are not factored in on this page. This may include things like complex language or sensitive topics not suitable for students of certain ages.
When deciding what to show young students always use your best judgement and consult a professional.
Wittgensteins Critique of Russells Multiple Relation Theory of Judgement by James R. Connelly is sold by several retailers and bookshops. However, Read Time works with Amazon to provide an easier way to purchase books.
To buy Wittgensteins Critique of Russells Multiple Relation Theory of Judgement by James R. Connelly on Amazon click the button below.
Buy Wittgensteins Critique of Russells Multiple Relation Theory of Judgement on Amazon